Comparison with ARKit features
Apple ARKit also provides 3D object detection and tracking features, but there are significant differences from EasyAR in model preparation, usage, and application scenarios. This article compares the two to help developers choose the appropriate technical solution according to project requirements.
Feature comparison
The core differences between ARKit and EasyAR in 3D object tracking features are as follows:
| Feature | ARKit | EasyAR |
|---|---|---|
| Model preparation | Developers need to compile and run a scanning App on an iOS device to scan and model the target object in real time | No restrictions on scanning or modeling tools; supports models exported by any modeling software, such as Blender or Maya |
| Model format | Proprietary format .arobject |
Industry-standard format Wavefront OBJ, with stronger compatibility |
| Model optimization | Cannot directly modify the model; needs rescanning; external optimization is not supported | Can use professional tools, such as Blender or Maya, to optimize geometry and textures, with flexible adjustment |
| Object size | Suitable for small objects that can be placed on a tabletop | Wide size range, recommended 10cm ~ 2m, depending on the specific application scenario |
| Detection environment | The detection environment is recommended to be highly similar to the scanning environment, such as lighting and background | High tolerance to environment changes, supports different lighting and backgrounds |
| Tracking mode | During tracking, the target object needs to remain stationary in the environment | Supports free movement of objects in the environment, such as handheld or rotated, with continuous tracking |
| Device support | Limited to iOS devices that support ARKit (iPhone/iPad), with high hardware requirements | Cross-platform support (Android, iOS, Windows, macOS), with low hardware threshold |
Note
Special note: The descriptions of ARKit 3D object tracking feature characteristics in the table come from Apple official documentation (as of January 15, 2026). If there are updates, refer to the latest version.
Summary
ARKit and EasyAR each have different emphases in 3D object tracking. How to choose depends on project requirements:
- Choose ARKit: If your application targets only the iOS ecosystem, and the object size is small and the environment is relatively fixed, such as tabletop toys or educational models, ARKit's seamless integration is an ideal choice.
- Choose EasyAR: If your application needs cross-platform support, varied object sizes, dynamically changing environments, such as industrial inspection, retail display, or outdoor applications, or you want flexible model optimization, EasyAR's general format, environmental robustness, and hardware compatibility have more advantages.
It is recommended to comprehensively evaluate from perspectives such as target object characteristics, target user device distribution, and scenario usage.